PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.86%
Revenue decline while PINS shows 16.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.70%
Similar cost growth to PINS's 1.88%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-9.43%
Gross profit decline while PINS shows 21.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.70%
Margin decline while PINS shows 3.87% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.21%
R&D growth less than half of PINS's 8.43%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-1.35%
G&A reduction while PINS shows 20.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
6.99%
Marketing expense growth less than half of PINS's 23.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-40.82%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.17%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PINS's 15.68%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.80%
Total costs growth less than half of PINS's 12.59%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
92.86%
Interest expense change of 92.86% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
1.66%
D&A growth less than half of PINS's 4.14%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-17.43%
EBITDA decline while PINS shows 104.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.39%
EBITDA margin decline while PINS shows 104.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.48%
Operating income decline while PINS shows 87.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.79%
Operating margin decline while PINS shows 89.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1966.67%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 22.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-19.20%
Pre-tax income decline while PINS shows 1045.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.31%
Pre-tax margin decline while PINS shows 909.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.07%
Tax expense reduction while PINS shows 67.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.45%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 334.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.92%
Net margin growth below 50% of PINS's 272.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.64%
EPS decline while PINS shows 334.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.70%
Diluted EPS decline while PINS shows 335.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.04%
Share count reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.94%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.