PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.58%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 16.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
9.31%
Cost growth above 1.5x PINS's 1.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
21.48%
Similar gross profit growth to PINS's 21.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
1.58%
Margin expansion below 50% of PINS's 3.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.94%
Similar R&D growth to PINS's 8.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
12.57%
G&A growth 50-75% of PINS's 20.11%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
8.84%
Marketing expense growth less than half of PINS's 23.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-141.38%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
9.43%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PINS's 15.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
9.40%
Total costs growth 50-75% of PINS's 12.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
18.52%
Interest expense change of 18.52% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
5.98%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 4.14%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
29.55%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PINS's 104.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.33%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PINS's 104.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.02%
Operating income growth below 50% of PINS's 87.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.74%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PINS's 89.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-64.29%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 22.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
33.30%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PINS's 1045.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.47%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PINS's 909.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
43.60%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of PINS's 67.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
31.41%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 334.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.81%
Net margin growth below 50% of PINS's 272.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.85%
EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 334.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.54%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 335.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.59%
Share count reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.55%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.