PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.82%
Revenue decline while PINS shows 16.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
10.70%
Cost growth above 1.5x PINS's 1.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-11.45%
Gross profit decline while PINS shows 21.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.89%
Margin decline while PINS shows 3.87% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
17.34%
R&D growth above 1.5x PINS's 8.43%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
27.18%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 20.11%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
-5.46%
Marketing expense reduction while PINS shows 23.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
200.00%
Other expenses change of 200.00% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
10.95%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PINS's 15.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
10.89%
Similar total costs growth to PINS's 12.59%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
19.64%
Interest expense change of 19.64% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
9.28%
D&A growth above 1.5x PINS's 4.14%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-22.83%
EBITDA decline while PINS shows 104.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.37%
EBITDA margin decline while PINS shows 104.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.15%
Operating income decline while PINS shows 87.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.10%
Operating margin decline while PINS shows 89.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
338.24%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 22.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-24.82%
Pre-tax income decline while PINS shows 1045.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.55%
Pre-tax margin decline while PINS shows 909.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-64.32%
Tax expense reduction while PINS shows 67.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.07%
Net income decline while PINS shows 334.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.82%
Net margin decline while PINS shows 272.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.52%
EPS decline while PINS shows 334.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.05%
Diluted EPS decline while PINS shows 335.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.29%
Share count reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.20%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.