PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.05%
Similar revenue growth to PINS's 16.75%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
6.73%
Cost growth above 1.5x PINS's 1.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
17.62%
Similar gross profit growth to PINS's 21.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
1.35%
Margin expansion below 50% of PINS's 3.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.63%
R&D growth 50-75% of PINS's 8.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
-2.29%
G&A reduction while PINS shows 20.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
6.34%
Marketing expense growth less than half of PINS's 23.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-128.57%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.86%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PINS's 15.68%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.57%
Total costs growth less than half of PINS's 12.59%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
35.82%
Interest expense change of 35.82% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
8.49%
D&A growth above 1.5x PINS's 4.14%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
28.31%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PINS's 104.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.57%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PINS's 104.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
32.28%
Operating income growth below 50% of PINS's 87.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.99%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PINS's 89.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.41%
Other expenses growth less than half of PINS's 22.54%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
31.69%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PINS's 1045.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.48%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PINS's 909.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
72.67%
Similar tax expense growth to PINS's 67.40%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
27.17%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 334.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.51%
Net margin growth below 50% of PINS's 272.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.42%
EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 334.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.92%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 335.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.30%
Share count reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.24%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.