PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.80%
Revenue growth 50-75% of PINS's 16.75%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
17.06%
Cost growth above 1.5x PINS's 1.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.85%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PINS's 21.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.86%
Margin decline while PINS shows 3.87% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.93%
Similar R&D growth to PINS's 8.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-16.25%
G&A reduction while PINS shows 20.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
4.09%
Marketing expense growth less than half of PINS's 23.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
250.00%
Other expenses change of 250.00% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
2.04%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PINS's 15.68%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.81%
Total costs growth less than half of PINS's 12.59%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
18.68%
Interest expense change of 18.68% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
6.18%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 4.14%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
14.89%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PINS's 104.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.69%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PINS's 104.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.38%
Operating income growth below 50% of PINS's 87.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.04%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PINS's 89.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
31.03%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 22.54%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
16.67%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PINS's 1045.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.29%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PINS's 909.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.94%
Tax expense reduction while PINS shows 67.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.93%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 334.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.09%
Net margin growth below 50% of PINS's 272.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.90%
EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 334.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.45%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 335.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.21%
Share count reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.17%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.