PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.60%
Growth of 25.60% while PINS shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
11.26%
Cost growth of 11.26% while PINS maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
27.94%
Growth of 27.94% while PINS shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
1.86%
Margin change of 1.86% while PINS shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-5.02%
R&D reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
27.99%
G&A change of 27.99% while PINS maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
17.44%
Marketing expense change of 17.44% while PINS maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-266.67%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
6.68%
Operating expenses change of 6.68% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
7.95%
Total costs change of 7.95% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
16.67%
Interest expense change of 16.67% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
10.35%
D&A change of 10.35% while PINS maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
39.21%
EBITDA change of 39.21% while PINS is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
10.84%
Margin change of 10.84% while PINS is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
43.54%
Income change of 43.54% while PINS is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
14.28%
Margin change of 14.28% while PINS is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-3.51%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
42.51%
Income change of 42.51% while PINS is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
13.47%
Margin change of 13.47% while PINS is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
503.59%
Tax expense change of 503.59% while PINS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-9.27%
Net income decline while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.81%
Net margin decline while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.26%
EPS decline while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.43%
Diluted EPS decline while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.03%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.07%
Diluted share reduction while PINS shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.