PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.76%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
19.62%
Cost growth above 1.5x PINS's 6.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-11.64%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.83%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 10.22%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
10.35%
Similar G&A growth to PINS's 10.46%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
16.08%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PINS's 8.08%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
260.00%
Other expenses change of 260.00% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
14.49%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 9.09%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
15.96%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PINS's 8.25%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
15.08%
Interest expense change of 15.08% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
11.25%
D&A growth 50-75% of PINS's 22.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-22.02%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
46.36%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 16.71%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-24.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.52%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
16.85%
Net income growth while PINS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.70%
Net margin growth while PINS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.01%
EPS growth while PINS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.36%
Diluted EPS growth while PINS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.30%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 253.89% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.30%
Diluted share reduction while PINS shows 253.89% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.