PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.57%
Revenue growth below 50% of PINS's 22.71%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
14.89%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x PINS's 12.24%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
9.74%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PINS's 29.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.75%
Margin decline while PINS shows 5.53% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
12.73%
R&D growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.59%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
2.51%
G&A growth while PINS reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
16.30%
Similar marketing expense growth to PINS's 16.81%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
-962.50%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
12.29%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 7.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.06%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PINS's 8.70%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-1.38%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.96%
D&A growth 50-75% of PINS's 15.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
7.80%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PINS's 31.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.51%
EBITDA margin decline while PINS shows 44.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.60%
Operating income growth below 50% of PINS's 24.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.69%
Operating margin decline while PINS shows 38.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-96.89%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 24.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.60%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PINS's 26.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.40%
Pre-tax margin decline while PINS shows 40.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
22.51%
Tax expense growth while PINS reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.39%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 27.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.42%
Net margin decline while PINS shows 40.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.33%
EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 28.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.96%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 28.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.49%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.36%
Diluted share reduction while PINS shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.