PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.75%
Revenue growth below 50% of PINS's 17.99%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
9.21%
Similar cost growth to PINS's 9.79%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
2.65%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PINS's 22.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.06%
Margin decline while PINS shows 3.91% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.31%
R&D growth above 1.5x PINS's 3.14%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
21.52%
G&A growth above 1.5x PINS's 4.95%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
3.94%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.42%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
67.39%
Other expenses change of 67.39% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
7.26%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 3.04%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.84%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PINS's 4.97%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
23.08%
Interest expense growth while PINS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.06%
D&A growth while PINS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.13%
EBITDA decline while PINS shows 47.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.74%
EBITDA margin decline while PINS shows 55.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.40%
Operating income decline while PINS shows 45.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.96%
Operating margin decline while PINS shows 54.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2520.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 22.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
0.75%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PINS's 51.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.89%
Pre-tax margin decline while PINS shows 58.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.71%
Tax expense growth less than half of PINS's 500.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.61%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 50.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.03%
Net margin decline while PINS shows 58.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.14%
EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 50.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.15%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 50.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.58%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while PINS shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.