PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.22%
Revenue growth 50-75% of PINS's 43.63%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
15.63%
Cost growth above 1.5x PINS's 7.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
24.84%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PINS's 61.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.32%
Margin expansion below 50% of PINS's 12.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.45%
R&D growth above 1.5x PINS's 4.61%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
3.50%
G&A growth less than half of PINS's 17.87%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
27.96%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PINS's 8.34%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
493.33%
Other expenses change of 493.33% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
13.93%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 7.95%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.45%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PINS's 7.76%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.25%
Interest expense growth less than half of PINS's 657.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
10.66%
D&A growth above 1.5x PINS's 6.39%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
31.32%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PINS's 404.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.57%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PINS's 314.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.27%
Operating income growth below 50% of PINS's 296.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PINS's 236.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.27%
Other expenses growth while PINS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
34.83%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PINS's 351.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.42%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PINS's 274.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
40.52%
Tax expense growth less than half of PINS's 181.94%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
33.97%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 349.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.73%
Net margin growth below 50% of PINS's 273.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.83%
EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 337.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.23%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 337.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.93%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.12%
Diluted share reduction while PINS shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.