PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.54%
Revenue growth 50-75% of PINS's 7.06%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-4.60%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
6.76%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PINS's 25.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.13%
Margin expansion below 50% of PINS's 17.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.03%
R&D growth while PINS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-58.19%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
0.08%
Marketing expense growth while PINS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-776.92%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.33%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.62%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
17.81%
Interest expense growth less than half of PINS's 135.71%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.73%
D&A reduction while PINS shows 12.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.82%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PINS's 89.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.23%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PINS's 90.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.44%
Operating income growth below 50% of PINS's 88.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.73%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PINS's 89.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-30.10%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 14.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
51.68%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of PINS's 89.23%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
45.09%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of PINS's 89.94%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-44.13%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
132.84%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 89.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
122.73%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 89.95%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
131.52%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 91.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
132.97%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 91.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.06%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 23.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction while PINS shows 23.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.