PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.43%
Revenue growth below 50% of PINS's 42.97%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
10.68%
Cost growth 50-75% of PINS's 15.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
21.34%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PINS's 54.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.59%
Margin expansion below 50% of PINS's 8.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.27%
R&D growth while PINS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
35.68%
G&A growth above 1.5x PINS's 5.42%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
25.25%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PINS's 15.17%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
264.04%
Other expenses change of 264.04% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
19.42%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 5.13%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.79%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PINS's 7.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-11.24%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.67%
D&A growth less than half of PINS's 13.74%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
20.06%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PINS's 77.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.52%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PINS's 83.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.28%
Operating income growth below 50% of PINS's 67.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.23%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PINS's 77.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
115.97%
Other expenses growth while PINS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.11%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PINS's 71.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.75%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PINS's 80.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
47.01%
Tax expense growth less than half of PINS's 373.60%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
20.65%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 71.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.02%
Net margin growth below 50% of PINS's 79.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.13%
EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 72.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.75%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 72.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.31%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 2.98% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while PINS shows 2.98% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.