PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.87%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.95%
Cost reduction while PINS shows 3.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-18.83%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.56%
R&D growth while PINS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-13.45%
G&A reduction while PINS shows 3.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-7.90%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-239.04%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.97%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.11%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.44%
Interest expense reduction while PINS shows 1461.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.79%
D&A growth less than half of PINS's 41.60%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-27.46%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-110.29%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-36.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.31%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-33.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.20%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.09%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PINS's 2.47%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while PINS shows 2.47% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.