PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PINS's 0.20%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.70%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x PINS's 9.10%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
4.06%
Positive growth while PINS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.13%
R&D growth while PINS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
0.63%
G&A growth while PINS reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
1.90%
Marketing expense growth while PINS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
102.31%
Other expenses change of 102.31% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
6.08%
Operating expenses growth while PINS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.43%
Total costs growth while PINS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-28.95%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.70%
D&A growth while PINS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.36%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PINS's 28.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.84%
EBITDA margin decline while PINS shows 27.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.19%
Operating income growth below 50% of PINS's 28.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.96%
Operating margin decline while PINS shows 28.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
625.00%
Other expenses growth while PINS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.61%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PINS's 28.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.71%
Pre-tax margin decline while PINS shows 29.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.63%
Tax expense reduction while PINS shows 133.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.63%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 28.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Net margin growth below 50% of PINS's 28.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.81%
EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 32.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 32.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.35%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PINS's 1.81%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.38%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PINS's 1.81%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.