743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.89%
Revenue growth below 50% of PINS's 62.44%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
9.53%
Cost growth above 1.5x PINS's 4.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
16.27%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PINS's 100.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.20%
Margin expansion below 50% of PINS's 23.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.75%
R&D growth less than half of PINS's 17.27%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
12.37%
G&A growth less than half of PINS's 224.18%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-5.53%
Marketing expense reduction while PINS shows 37.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-983.33%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.83%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PINS's 58.81%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.55%
Total costs growth less than half of PINS's 43.14%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-9.88%
Interest expense reduction while PINS shows 218.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.35%
D&A reduction while PINS shows 5.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
27.01%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x PINS's 7.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.55%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PINS's 42.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.83%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x PINS's 7.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
17.35%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PINS's 42.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-44.64%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
32.65%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x PINS's 6.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.46%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PINS's 42.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-69.88%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
51.53%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x PINS's 6.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
31.88%
Similar net margin growth to PINS's 42.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
51.10%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PINS's 5.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
50.56%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PINS's 5.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.50%
Share count reduction below 50% of PINS's 0.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.56%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PINS's 2.86%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.