PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.10%
Revenue growth below 50% of PINS's 26.38%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.22%
Cost increase while PINS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
12.54%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PINS's 37.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.29%
Margin expansion below 50% of PINS's 9.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.30%
R&D growth above 1.5x PINS's 5.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
20.59%
G&A growth while PINS reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
14.63%
Marketing expense growth 50-75% of PINS's 26.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
-75.00%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
17.07%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 10.55%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.96%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PINS's 6.67%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.54%
Interest expense growth while PINS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.71%
D&A growth while PINS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.51%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PINS's 581.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.23%
EBITDA margin decline while PINS shows 521.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.69%
Operating income growth below 50% of PINS's 410.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.17%
Operating margin decline while PINS shows 345.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.80%
Other expenses growth less than half of PINS's 2159.15%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
8.78%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PINS's 416.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.09%
Pre-tax margin decline while PINS shows 350.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.63%
Tax expense growth less than half of PINS's 348.51%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.45%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 420.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.49%
Net margin decline while PINS shows 353.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.88%
EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 418.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.39%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 389.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.03%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 1.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while PINS shows 10.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.