PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.23%
Revenue decline while PINS shows 3.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
6.89%
Cost increase while PINS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-1.85%
Gross profit decline while PINS shows 4.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.63%
Margin decline while PINS shows 1.03% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.61%
R&D growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.32%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
50.61%
G&A growth while PINS reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
9.05%
Marketing expense growth while PINS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
180.00%
Other expenses change of 180.00% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
13.31%
Operating expenses growth while PINS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.23%
Total costs growth while PINS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.83%
Interest expense reduction while PINS shows 1313.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.45%
D&A growth above 1.5x PINS's 0.12%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-13.48%
EBITDA decline while PINS shows 29.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.28%
EBITDA margin decline while PINS shows 31.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.72%
Operating income decline while PINS shows 38.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.52%
Operating margin decline while PINS shows 33.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.74%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.57%
Pre-tax income decline while PINS shows 29.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.37%
Pre-tax margin decline while PINS shows 25.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.30%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-11.55%
Net income decline while PINS shows 35.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.34%
Net margin decline while PINS shows 31.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.90%
EPS decline while PINS shows 36.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.80%
Diluted EPS decline while PINS shows 40.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.75%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 1.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.70%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.