PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.07%
Revenue growth below 50% of PINS's 33.77%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
10.00%
Similar cost growth to PINS's 11.41%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
17.57%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PINS's 39.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.30%
Margin expansion below 50% of PINS's 4.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.56%
R&D growth less than half of PINS's 29.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
12.19%
G&A growth less than half of PINS's 44.04%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
23.44%
Similar marketing expense growth to PINS's 22.06%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
-78.57%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
15.00%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PINS's 29.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
13.44%
Total costs growth 50-75% of PINS's 24.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-15.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.95%
D&A growth less than half of PINS's 6.49%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
17.56%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PINS's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.29%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PINS's 27.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.74%
Operating income growth below 50% of PINS's 82.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.03%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PINS's 36.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-16.90%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 34.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.24%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PINS's 87.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.59%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PINS's 39.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
76.37%
Tax expense growth less than half of PINS's 372.85%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
11.87%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 85.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.62%
Net margin decline while PINS shows 38.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.76%
EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 80.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 78.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.04%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 1.10% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.10%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.