PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.94%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-26.73%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-5.42%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.20%
Margin expansion while PINS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.99%
R&D reduction while PINS shows 0.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-6.48%
G&A reduction while PINS shows 100.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-33.45%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-12.16%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-16.87%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
71.88%
Interest expense change of 71.88% while PINS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
6.23%
D&A growth while PINS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.52%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
132.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 86.75%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
18.83%
Pre-tax income growth while PINS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.43%
Pre-tax margin growth while PINS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.82%
Tax expense growth while PINS reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.70%
Net income growth while PINS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.77%
Net margin growth while PINS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.57%
EPS growth while PINS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PINS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.93%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 1.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.67%
Diluted share reduction while PINS shows 1.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.