PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.71%
Similar revenue growth to PINS's 7.79%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
4.46%
Cost growth above 1.5x PINS's 1.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
7.22%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PINS's 9.81%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
0.48%
Margin expansion below 50% of PINS's 1.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.10%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-50.29%
G&A reduction while PINS shows 6.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-8.78%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.85%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.77%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
19.83%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x PINS's 7.24%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
9.00%
D&A growth while PINS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.25%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PINS's 99.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.49%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PINS's 99.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
47.54%
Operating income growth 50-75% of PINS's 93.17%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
38.26%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PINS's 93.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
374.75%
Other expenses growth while PINS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
50.87%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PINS's 137.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
41.38%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PINS's 134.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
61.93%
Tax expense growth less than half of PINS's 192.25%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
48.73%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 119.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
39.38%
Net margin growth below 50% of PINS's 117.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
48.51%
EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 119.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
47.32%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 118.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.31%
Share count increase while PINS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.11%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PINS's 1.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.