PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.55%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-14.33%
Cost reduction while PINS shows 1.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-12.15%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.46%
Margin expansion while PINS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.25%
R&D reduction while PINS shows 3.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
199.21%
G&A growth above 1.5x PINS's 1.83%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-14.91%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.21%
Operating expenses growth while PINS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.05%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.61%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.22%
EBITDA margin growth while PINS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-24.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
342.25%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PINS's 108.60%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-21.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.96%
Tax expense reduction while PINS shows 99.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.13%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.83%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.32%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.28%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 0.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.92%
Diluted share reduction while PINS shows 0.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.