PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.29%
Revenue growth 50-75% of PINS's 16.75%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
12.14%
Cost growth above 1.5x PINS's 1.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
12.33%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PINS's 21.27%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
0.03%
Margin expansion below 50% of PINS's 3.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.52%
Similar R&D growth to PINS's 8.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
16.80%
Similar G&A growth to PINS's 20.11%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
8.05%
Marketing expense growth less than half of PINS's 23.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.13%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PINS's 15.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
9.35%
Total costs growth 50-75% of PINS's 12.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while PINS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.33%
D&A growth above 1.5x PINS's 4.14%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
10.45%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PINS's 104.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.64%
EBITDA margin decline while PINS shows 104.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.44%
Operating income growth below 50% of PINS's 87.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.69%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PINS's 89.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-88.75%
Other expenses reduction while PINS shows 22.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.71%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PINS's 1045.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.52%
Pre-tax margin decline while PINS shows 909.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
26.41%
Tax expense growth less than half of PINS's 67.40%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
10.17%
Net income growth below 50% of PINS's 334.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.89%
Net margin decline while PINS shows 272.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.47%
EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 334.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.04%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PINS's 335.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.36%
Share count reduction while PINS shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.77%
Diluted share reduction while PINS shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.