PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.29%
Positive growth while SNAP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.14%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 8.17%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
12.33%
Positive growth while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.03%
Margin expansion while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.52%
R&D growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
16.80%
G&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.26%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
8.05%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.13%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.35%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while SNAP shows 17.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.33%
D&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.12%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
10.45%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.44%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.69%
Operating margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-88.75%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
11.71%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
26.41%
Tax expense growth while SNAP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.17%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.47%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.04%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.36%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.77%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.