PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
22.44%
Positive growth while SNAP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
25.75%
Cost growth above 1.5x SNAP's 8.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
21.45%
Positive growth while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
73.68%
R&D growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
62.75%
G&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.26%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
41.18%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.95%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.27%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
28.57%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x SNAP's 17.98%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
41.18%
D&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.12%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
9.11%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-10.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.90%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-180.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.25%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-18.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.64%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
3.00%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.85%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.84%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.