PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.59%
Positive growth while SNAP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.38%
Cost growth above 1.5x SNAP's 8.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.82%
Positive growth while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.09%
R&D growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-1.20%
G&A reduction while SNAP shows 6.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
18.75%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.35%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.66%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.11%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of SNAP's 17.98%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
34.72%
D&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.12%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
6.68%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.08%
EBITDA margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.72%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-337.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.40%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-5.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.56%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.63%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.