PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.55%
Positive growth while SNAP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.66%
Cost growth 50-75% of SNAP's 8.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
23.12%
Positive growth while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.85%
Margin expansion while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.81%
R&D growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-29.27%
G&A reduction while SNAP shows 6.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
35.96%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.86%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.15%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
60.00%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x SNAP's 17.98%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
6.19%
Similar D&A growth to SNAP's 6.12%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
27.20%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.29%
EBITDA margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.13%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.45%
Operating margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
Other expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
36.94%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.51%
Pre-tax margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.76%
Tax expense growth while SNAP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.04%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.22%
Net margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.66%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.25%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.