PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.45%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
12.15%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 8.17%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-11.65%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
23.39%
R&D growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
51.72%
G&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.26%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
2.58%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.69%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.92%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-18.75%
Interest expense reduction while SNAP shows 17.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.80%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x SNAP's 6.12%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-24.46%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
103.57%
Other expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.43%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-32.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.23%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.23%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.94%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-16.35%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.