PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.91%
Positive growth while SNAP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
32.49%
Cost growth above 1.5x SNAP's 8.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.61%
Positive growth while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
360.78%
R&D growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
426.14%
G&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.26%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
146.54%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
290.00%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
184.64%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-23.08%
Interest expense reduction while SNAP shows 17.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
26.36%
D&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.12%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-225.46%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-209.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-295.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-274.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2300.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-300.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-278.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-443.50%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-176.59%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-168.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-230.42%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-230.42%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.12%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-12.12%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.