PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.59%
Positive growth while SNAP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-12.26%
Cost reduction while SNAP shows 8.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
15.06%
Positive growth while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.94%
Margin expansion while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-65.39%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-67.39%
G&A reduction while SNAP shows 6.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-57.14%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.91%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-54.07%
Total costs reduction while SNAP shows 3.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.00%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of SNAP's 17.98%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
26.62%
D&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.12%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
190.75%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
185.90%
EBITDA margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
150.74%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
147.60%
Operating margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.27%
Other expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
148.63%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
145.62%
Pre-tax margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
170.89%
Tax expense growth while SNAP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
62.42%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.74%
Net margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.81%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.81%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.79%
Share count increase while SNAP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.79%
Diluted share increase while SNAP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.