PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.59%
Positive growth while SNAP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
23.60%
Cost growth above 1.5x SNAP's 8.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
26.28%
Positive growth while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.54%
Margin expansion while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
21.72%
R&D growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
15.23%
G&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.26%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
14.88%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.94%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.00%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
45.45%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x SNAP's 17.98%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
27.27%
D&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.12%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
33.27%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.55%
EBITDA margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.73%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.46%
Operating margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-260.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
35.75%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.09%
Pre-tax margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.32%
Tax expense growth while SNAP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
172.88%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
186.37%
Net margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
222.95%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
222.95%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.95%
Share count increase while SNAP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.55%
Diluted share increase while SNAP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.