PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.01%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
3.77%
Cost growth less than half of SNAP's 8.17%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-11.96%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.35%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
1.15%
G&A growth less than half of SNAP's 6.26%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
5.18%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-150.00%
Other expenses reduction while SNAP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.20%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.17%
Total costs growth 50-75% of SNAP's 3.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while SNAP shows 17.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.59%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x SNAP's 6.12%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-20.00%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-30.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.61%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
404.65%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
271.99%
Net margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.94%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.28%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.