PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
24.35%
Positive growth while SNAP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.59%
Cost growth above 1.5x SNAP's 8.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
29.00%
Positive growth while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.74%
Margin expansion while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.41%
R&D growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-1.70%
G&A reduction while SNAP shows 6.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
32.51%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
40.00%
Other expenses change of 40.00% while SNAP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
16.96%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.30%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.56%
D&A reduction while SNAP shows 6.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
42.45%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.67%
EBITDA margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.95%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.46%
Operating margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.00%
Other expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
54.39%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.16%
Pre-tax margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.21%
Tax expense growth while SNAP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
52.53%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.28%
Net margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
55.56%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.44%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.44%
Share count increase while SNAP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.12%
Diluted share increase while SNAP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.