PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.31%
Positive growth while SNAP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.38%
Cost growth less than half of SNAP's 8.17%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
19.46%
Positive growth while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.71%
Margin expansion while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.13%
R&D growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
5.35%
Similar G&A growth to SNAP's 6.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
10.84%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.50%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.52%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.65%
D&A reduction while SNAP shows 6.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
23.00%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.76%
EBITDA margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.30%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.17%
Operating margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.93%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.85%
Pre-tax margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.41%
Tax expense growth while SNAP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.32%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.93%
Net margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.00%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.32%
Share count increase while SNAP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.23%
Diluted share increase while SNAP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.