PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.07%
Positive growth while SNAP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
19.45%
Cost growth above 1.5x SNAP's 8.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.25%
Positive growth while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
23.58%
R&D growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
31.47%
G&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.26%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
4.47%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-1525.00%
Other expenses reduction while SNAP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
18.53%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.82%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.45%
D&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.12%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
2.37%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.50%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1425.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.92%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1.78%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.99%
Share count increase while SNAP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.11%
Diluted share increase while SNAP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.