PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.08%
Similar revenue growth to SNAP's 14.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
2.14%
Cost growth less than half of SNAP's 32.36%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
16.79%
Positive growth while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.37%
Margin expansion while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.17%
R&D growth above 1.5x SNAP's 1.99%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
11.31%
G&A growth while SNAP reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
0.97%
Marketing expense growth less than half of SNAP's 25.94%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-66.67%
Other expenses reduction while SNAP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
7.41%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.09%
Total costs growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
150.00%
Interest expense change of 150.00% while SNAP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
0.44%
D&A change of 0.44% while SNAP maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
24.60%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 6.14%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.22%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of SNAP's 18.36%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
36.44%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 5.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.60%
Similar operating margin growth to SNAP's 18.16%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
100.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SNAP's 10.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
36.59%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 5.95%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.73%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to SNAP's 18.19%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
31.90%
Tax expense growth less than half of SNAP's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
40.47%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 10.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
23.09%
Similar net margin growth to SNAP's 22.17%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
44.44%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 8.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
38.89%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 8.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.52%
Share count reduction below 50% of SNAP's 0.56%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.49%
Diluted share change of 0.49% while SNAP is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.