PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.36%
Revenue growth below 50% of SNAP's 215.57%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
7.78%
Cost growth less than half of SNAP's 38.50%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
12.06%
Positive growth while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.63%
Margin expansion below 50% of SNAP's 64.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.63%
Similar R&D growth to SNAP's 10.02%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
13.11%
G&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 2.77%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
12.78%
Marketing expense growth less than half of SNAP's 39.75%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-580.00%
Other expenses reduction while SNAP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
10.52%
Similar operating expenses growth to SNAP's 9.63%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
9.86%
Total costs growth less than half of SNAP's 22.21%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
40.00%
Interest expense change of 40.00% while SNAP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
5.88%
D&A growth less than half of SNAP's 16.33%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
12.30%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.85%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 65.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.61%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.92%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 65.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.49%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.02%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 65.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.25%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
24.62%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.91%
Net margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 61.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.08%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.45%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 2.58%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.46%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 2.58%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.