PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
29.77%
Revenue growth below 50% of SNAP's 95.62%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
14.44%
Similar cost growth to SNAP's 15.19%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
32.69%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 18.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.25%
Margin expansion below 50% of SNAP's 58.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.38%
R&D growth less than half of SNAP's 54.83%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
7.54%
G&A growth while SNAP reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
9.35%
Marketing expense growth 50-75% of SNAP's 18.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
244.12%
Other expenses change of 244.12% while SNAP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.81%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SNAP's 14.57%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.86%
Total costs growth 50-75% of SNAP's 14.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
100.00%
Interest expense change of 100.00% while SNAP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
11.73%
D&A growth while SNAP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
59.54%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 16.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
22.94%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 57.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
75.46%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 15.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
35.21%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of SNAP's 56.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
88.89%
Other expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
78.56%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.60%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to SNAP's 48.34%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
85.82%
Tax expense change of 85.82% while SNAP maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
74.41%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.34%
Net margin growth 50-75% of SNAP's 48.28%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
71.88%
EPS change of 71.88% while SNAP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
74.19%
Diluted EPS change of 74.19% while SNAP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.63%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 2.79%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.52%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 2.80%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.