PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.58%
Revenue growth below 50% of SNAP's 85.06%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
9.31%
Cost growth less than half of SNAP's 25.05%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
21.48%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of SNAP's 37.91%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.58%
Margin expansion below 50% of SNAP's 66.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.94%
R&D growth less than half of SNAP's 28.31%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
12.57%
G&A growth less than half of SNAP's 34.36%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
8.84%
Marketing expense growth less than half of SNAP's 66.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-141.38%
Other expenses reduction while SNAP shows 5.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
9.43%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SNAP's 38.98%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.40%
Total costs growth less than half of SNAP's 31.58%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
18.52%
Interest expense change of 18.52% while SNAP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
5.98%
D&A growth less than half of SNAP's 18.76%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
29.55%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.33%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 40.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.02%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.74%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 39.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-64.29%
Other expenses reduction while SNAP shows 89.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
33.30%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.47%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 40.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
43.60%
Tax expense growth while SNAP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.41%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.81%
Net margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 40.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.85%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.54%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.59%
Share count change of 0.59% while SNAP is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.55%
Diluted share change of 0.55% while SNAP is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.