PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.93%
Revenue growth below 50% of SNAP's 78.56%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
7.75%
Cost growth less than half of SNAP's 34.85%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
9.13%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SNAP's 101.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.18%
Margin expansion below 50% of SNAP's 101.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.19%
R&D growth less than half of SNAP's 51.34%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
6.31%
G&A growth less than half of SNAP's 30.72%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
2.89%
Marketing expense growth less than half of SNAP's 40.96%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
75.00%
Other expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.61%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SNAP's 41.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.39%
Total costs growth less than half of SNAP's 38.11%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
56.25%
Interest expense change of 56.25% while SNAP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
1.03%
D&A growth less than half of SNAP's 24.03%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
11.72%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.56%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 37.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.01%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.66%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 36.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
135.00%
Other expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.89%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.47%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 36.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.01%
Tax expense growth while SNAP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.11%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.27%
Net margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 39.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.28%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.49%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.38%
Share count change of 0.38% while SNAP is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.34%
Diluted share change of 0.34% while SNAP is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.