PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.76%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
19.62%
Cost growth above 1.5x SNAP's 2.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-11.64%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.83%
R&D growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
10.35%
Similar G&A growth to SNAP's 10.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
16.08%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
260.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SNAP's 23.50%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
14.49%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.96%
Total costs growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.08%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.62%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
11.25%
Similar D&A growth to SNAP's 14.73%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-22.02%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
46.36%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SNAP's 7.44%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-24.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.52%
Tax expense reduction while SNAP shows 148.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.85%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.70%
Net margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.01%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.36%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.30%
Share count reduction while SNAP shows 2.14% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.30%
Diluted share reduction while SNAP shows 1.69% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.