PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.57%
Similar revenue growth to SNAP's 13.70%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
14.89%
Cost increase while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.74%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SNAP's 108.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.75%
Margin decline while SNAP shows 83.60% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
12.73%
R&D growth above 1.5x SNAP's 1.12%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
2.51%
G&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 0.25%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
16.30%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-962.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
12.29%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SNAP's 0.50%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.06%
Total costs growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.38%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.96%
D&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 4.46%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
7.80%
Similar EBITDA growth to SNAP's 9.10%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-2.51%
EBITDA margin decline while SNAP shows 20.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.60%
Similar operating income growth to SNAP's 8.84%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-2.69%
Operating margin decline while SNAP shows 19.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-96.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.60%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of SNAP's 8.32%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-5.40%
Pre-tax margin decline while SNAP shows 19.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
22.51%
Tax expense growth while SNAP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.39%
Net income growth below 50% of SNAP's 8.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.42%
Net margin decline while SNAP shows 19.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.33%
EPS growth below 50% of SNAP's 10.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.96%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SNAP's 10.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.49%
Share count reduction while SNAP shows 1.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.36%
Diluted share reduction while SNAP shows 1.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.