PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.75%
Revenue growth below 50% of SNAP's 13.51%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
9.21%
Cost growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
2.65%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SNAP's 41.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.06%
Margin decline while SNAP shows 24.79% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.31%
R&D growth above 1.5x SNAP's 0.13%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
21.52%
G&A growth while SNAP reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
3.94%
Marketing expense growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
67.39%
Other expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.26%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.84%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
23.08%
Interest expense growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.06%
D&A growth 50-75% of SNAP's 10.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-0.13%
EBITDA decline while SNAP shows 9.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.74%
EBITDA margin decline while SNAP shows 19.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.40%
Operating income decline while SNAP shows 9.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.96%
Operating margin decline while SNAP shows 20.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2520.00%
Other expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.75%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SNAP's 7.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.89%
Pre-tax margin decline while SNAP shows 18.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.71%
Tax expense growth while SNAP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.61%
Net income growth below 50% of SNAP's 7.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.03%
Net margin decline while SNAP shows 18.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.14%
EPS growth below 50% of SNAP's 7.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.15%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SNAP's 7.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.58%
Share count reduction while SNAP shows 1.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while SNAP shows 1.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.