PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.22%
Similar revenue growth to SNAP's 30.95%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
15.63%
Cost growth above 1.5x SNAP's 7.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
24.84%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SNAP's 76.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.32%
Margin expansion below 50% of SNAP's 34.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.45%
R&D growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
3.50%
G&A growth while SNAP reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
27.96%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x SNAP's 1.97%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
493.33%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SNAP's 51.28%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
13.93%
Operating expenses growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.45%
Total costs growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.25%
Interest expense growth less than half of SNAP's 20.89%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
10.66%
D&A growth while SNAP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.32%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of SNAP's 43.75%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
6.57%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 57.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.27%
Similar operating income growth to SNAP's 39.79%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
9.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 54.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.27%
Other expenses growth less than half of SNAP's 275.28%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
34.83%
Similar pre-tax income growth to SNAP's 40.90%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
9.42%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 54.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
40.52%
Tax expense growth while SNAP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.97%
Similar net income growth to SNAP's 41.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
8.73%
Net margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 54.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.83%
Similar EPS growth to SNAP's 44.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
35.23%
Similar diluted EPS growth to SNAP's 44.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.93%
Share count reduction while SNAP shows 1.14% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.12%
Diluted share reduction while SNAP shows 1.14% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.