PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.86%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
0.72%
Cost increase while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-13.15%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.18%
R&D growth less than half of SNAP's 31.47%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
316.39%
G&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 10.21%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-18.12%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-118.64%
Other expenses reduction while SNAP shows 69.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
42.01%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SNAP's 16.45%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
29.32%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 8.89%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.88%
Interest expense growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.61%
D&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 2.81%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-15.18%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.27%
Other expenses growth less than half of SNAP's 120.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-56.32%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.31%
Tax expense reduction while SNAP shows 179.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-64.71%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-64.58%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-64.29%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.98%
Share count reduction while SNAP shows 1.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.59%
Diluted share reduction while SNAP shows 1.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.