PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.00%
Revenue growth 50-75% of SNAP's 21.10%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
17.44%
Cost growth above 1.5x SNAP's 5.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
10.75%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SNAP's 47.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.12%
Margin decline while SNAP shows 22.13% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
15.91%
R&D growth above 1.5x SNAP's 9.26%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-20.67%
G&A reduction while SNAP shows 9.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
19.50%
Marketing expense growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 13.92%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize spending rationale.
60.61%
Other expenses growth less than half of SNAP's 4011.71%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.10%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SNAP's 10.31%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.25%
Total costs growth less than half of SNAP's 8.85%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
10.61%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x SNAP's 7.01%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
10.85%
D&A growth while SNAP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.94%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SNAP's 19.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.41%
EBITDA margin decline while SNAP shows 33.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.89%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 3.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-6.35%
Operating margin decline while SNAP shows 20.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
24.85%
Other expenses growth less than half of SNAP's 754.91%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
38.77%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 18.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
23.90%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of SNAP's 32.34%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
110.45%
Tax expense growth less than half of SNAP's 286.38%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
7.70%
Net income growth below 50% of SNAP's 17.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.84%
Net margin decline while SNAP shows 32.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.24%
EPS growth below 50% of SNAP's 17.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.06%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SNAP's 17.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.60%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 1.64%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 1.64%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.