PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.54%
Revenue growth below 50% of SNAP's 14.99%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-4.60%
Cost reduction while SNAP shows 3.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
6.76%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SNAP's 29.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.13%
Margin expansion below 50% of SNAP's 12.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.03%
R&D growth while SNAP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-58.19%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
0.08%
Marketing expense growth less than half of SNAP's 10.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-776.92%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-18.33%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.62%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
17.81%
Interest expense growth less than half of SNAP's 969.72%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.73%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.82%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SNAP's 13.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.23%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 24.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.44%
Operating income growth below 50% of SNAP's 24.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.73%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 34.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-30.10%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
51.68%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 10.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
45.09%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 21.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-44.13%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
132.84%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 10.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
122.73%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 22.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
131.52%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 15.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
132.97%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 15.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.06%
Share count reduction while SNAP shows 2.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction while SNAP shows 2.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.