PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.43%
Similar revenue growth to SNAP's 25.70%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
10.68%
Similar cost growth to SNAP's 13.58%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
21.34%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of SNAP's 37.83%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.59%
Margin expansion below 50% of SNAP's 9.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.27%
R&D growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
35.68%
G&A growth less than half of SNAP's 84.11%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
25.25%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x SNAP's 2.22%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
264.04%
Other expenses growth less than half of SNAP's 1284.06%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
19.42%
Similar operating expenses growth to SNAP's 24.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
16.79%
Similar total costs growth to SNAP's 20.66%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-11.24%
Interest expense reduction while SNAP shows 70.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.67%
D&A growth while SNAP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.06%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.52%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 18.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.28%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.23%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 11.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
115.97%
Other expenses growth less than half of SNAP's 7165.93%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
25.11%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.75%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 16.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
47.01%
Tax expense growth less than half of SNAP's 125.62%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
20.65%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.02%
Net margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 15.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.13%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.75%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.31%
Share count reduction while SNAP shows 1.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while SNAP shows 1.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.