PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.36%
Positive growth while SNAP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.70%
Cost increase while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
4.06%
Positive growth while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.13%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x SNAP's 9.32%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
0.63%
G&A growth while SNAP reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
1.90%
Marketing expense growth less than half of SNAP's 8.11%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
102.31%
Similar other expenses growth to SNAP's 128.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
6.08%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.81%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.43%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 2.13%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-28.95%
Interest expense reduction while SNAP shows 63.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.70%
D&A growth while SNAP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.36%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.19%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
625.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SNAP's 13.37%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
4.61%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.63%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
5.63%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.26%
Net margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.81%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.35%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 1.45%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.38%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 1.45%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.