PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.89%
Revenue growth below 50% of SNAP's 49.43%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
9.53%
Cost growth 50-75% of SNAP's 17.03%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
16.27%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SNAP's 89.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.20%
Margin expansion below 50% of SNAP's 26.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.75%
Similar R&D growth to SNAP's 8.73%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
12.37%
G&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 4.08%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-5.53%
Marketing expense reduction while SNAP shows 8.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-983.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.83%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of SNAP's 7.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
5.55%
Total costs growth 50-75% of SNAP's 10.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-9.88%
Interest expense reduction while SNAP shows 14.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.35%
D&A reduction while SNAP shows 4.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
27.01%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of SNAP's 47.06%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
10.55%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 64.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.83%
Similar operating income growth to SNAP's 45.96%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
17.35%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 63.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-44.64%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
32.65%
Similar pre-tax income growth to SNAP's 39.16%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
15.46%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 59.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-69.88%
Tax expense reduction while SNAP shows 187.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
51.53%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 38.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
31.88%
Net margin growth 50-75% of SNAP's 58.97%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
51.10%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 39.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
50.56%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 39.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.50%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 1.34%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.56%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 1.34%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.