PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
30.75%
Similar revenue growth to SNAP's 34.28%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
24.23%
Similar cost growth to SNAP's 31.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
32.33%
Similar gross profit growth to SNAP's 36.36%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
1.21%
Similar margin change to SNAP's 1.55%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
9.34%
Similar R&D growth to SNAP's 12.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-10.67%
G&A reduction while SNAP shows 16.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
22.25%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x SNAP's 9.84%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
615.09%
Similar other expenses growth to SNAP's 619.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
9.21%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of SNAP's 12.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
13.90%
Total costs growth 50-75% of SNAP's 19.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-6.85%
Interest expense reduction while SNAP shows 3.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.72%
D&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 4.62%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
50.32%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of SNAP's 71.14%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
14.97%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 78.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
58.89%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 42.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
21.52%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 56.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
201.08%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SNAP's 107.28%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
60.52%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 52.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
22.77%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 64.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
539.72%
Tax expense growth less than half of SNAP's 1894.17%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
42.99%
Similar net income growth to SNAP's 43.41%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
9.36%
Net margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 57.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
43.27%
Similar EPS growth to SNAP's 44.93%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
43.17%
Similar diluted EPS growth to SNAP's 45.57%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.03%
Share count reduction while SNAP shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.08%
Diluted share reduction while SNAP shows 1.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.